检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2007年第9期940-942,945,共4页China Journal of Endoscopy
基 金:2005年临沂市科技发展计划资助项目;项目编号:0508019
摘 要:目的探讨可回收防反流食管支架治疗贲门失弛缓症的效果及安全性。方法21例患者随机分为两组:支架放置1个月组10例,2个月组11例;经胃镜安装可回收防反流食管支架,术后1个月、2个月回收支架;支架取出后第6、12、18个月随访临床症状改善情况,支架取出后1年食管X线复查并与术前比较。结果所有患者支架均成功置入,顺利取出,无严重并发症发生。随访6~18个月,两组患者咽下困难缓解率均达100%,两组之间的中远期临床疗效差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后1年X线复查,支架置入1个月组食管直径由术前的(4.5±1.2)cm改善为(3.2±1.2)cm,支架置入2个月组食管直径由术前的(4.6±1.2)cm改善为(3.3±1.1)cm,两组术后1年食管直径与术前比较,差异均有极显著性(P<0.01)。结论可回收防反流食管支架治疗贲门失弛缓症具有操作简便、并发症少、回收方便、疗效确切等优点。[Objective] To observe the curable effect and safety of recycled anti-reflux esophageal stents on cardia achalasia. [Methods] Inserting recycled anti-reflux esophageal stents for 21 cases of achalasia, 21 cases were randomly divided into 2 groups: 10 cases in 1-month group and 11 in 2-month group; 1-2 months later, the stents were removed. We observed the symptoms in 6, 12, 18 months after stents were removed out. We also observe the x-ray presentation 12 months later and compared it with what showed before the stent were inserted. [Results] Stents were all easily inserted and smoothly removed. By 6-18 months of follow-up, the esophagus kept unobstructed. Long-term effect of two groups showed no significant difference, (P 〉0.05). 1 year later X-ray showed diameters of esophageal were reduced [ (4.5±1.2) cm Vs (3.2±1.2) cm in group 1, and (4.6±1.2) cm Vs (3.3±1.1) cm in group 2] (P〈0.01). [Conclusion] Recycled anti-reflux stents can be easily inserted under gastroscopy for cardia achalasia patients with few complications but long effect, also they can be recycled easily.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15