检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学医学院生物化学与分子生物学系,武汉430071 [2]湖北省脑科中心神经内科,武汉430015
出 处:《华中医学杂志》2007年第3期205-206,共2页Central China Medical Journal
基 金:湖北省卫生厅2005~2006年度科研基金指导性项目(JX2C69)
摘 要:目的研究卒中单元管理脑梗死患者的早期疗效。方法289例住院的脑梗死患者随机进入卒中单元和普通病房,观察指标是病死率、住院时间、神经功能评价(NIHSS)、生活能力评价(BI)、社会功能评价(OHS),出院时患者或亲属填写医疗满意度。结合住院花费分析卒中单元的效果。结果卒中单元组和普通病房组出入院NIHSS平均差值、BI平均差值、OHS平均差值均有极显著性(P<0.01);且卒中单元组住院病死率低(P<0.05),住院满意度高(P<0.01)。结论对脑梗死患者的治疗,卒中单元管理模式明显优于传统的住院治疗模式。Objective To investigate the early curative effectiveness of stroke unit (SU) on the patients with cerebral infarction. Methods 289 inpatients with cerebral infarction were randomly divided into SU group and general ward (GW) group. The key indexes recorded included mortality, hospital stay, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), Oxford Handicap Scale (OHS). All the patients or their relatives at the time of discharge were asked to have the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) which reflects patient satisfaction. All these data, in combination with cost and effect were analyzed with SPSS soft package. Results There was significant difference in mean gap scores between the day of admission and discharge (P〈0. 01) in NIHSS, BI and OHS. Mortality was lower (P〈0. 05), and patients' satisfaction higher in SU group than in GW group (P〈0. 01). Conclusion In comparison with traditional model, the patients with cerebral infarction can get more benefits from SU.
分 类 号:R743.33[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.43.16