检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学口腔医学院.口腔医院正畸科
出 处:《中华口腔医学杂志》2007年第10期608-609,共2页Chinese Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的比较不完全性腭裂患者修复术后与健康儿童替牙期颅面形态的差别,进一步了解不完全性腭裂患者的颅面特征。方法选择20例不完全性腭裂修复术后,处于替牙期的患者作为腭裂组,年龄7~11岁;选择年龄、性别匹配的非腭裂健康儿童35名作为对照组。对两组研究对象的头颅侧位 X 线片进行 X 线头影测量对比分析。结果腭裂组全颅底长、上颌长、下颌有效长度分别为86.48 mm、44.79 mm、65.45 mm,对照组分别为91.27 mm、48.84 mm、70.49 mm,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论不完全性腭裂患者颅面部发育不足,呈Ⅲ类骨面型。Objective To evaluate the craniofacial morphology of patients with isolated cleft palate in the mixed dentition after palatoplasty. Methods Twenty patients (7 to 11 years old) with isolated cleft palate in the mixed dentition were selected. The control group comprised 35 age-matched noncleft children without orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric analysis was carried out to evaluate craniofacial morphology. Results The mean values of total cranial base length, maxillary depth, mandibular effective length in cleft patients were 86. 48 mm,44.79 mm and 65.45 mm, respectively. Those in control group were 91.27 mm, 48. 84 mm and 70. 49 mm, respectively (P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusions Underdeveloped maxilla and class Ⅲ skeletal profile were presented in patients with isolated cleft palate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145