检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵建东[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省人民检察院/南京大学法学院,江苏南京210024
出 处:《河北法学》2007年第11期10-13,共4页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:我国最新的司法解释进一步明确了知识产权刑事案件公诉和自诉的规定,旨在切实保障知识产权被害人的刑事自诉权。然而,司法实践中知识产权刑事自诉案件极其罕见。认为在适用现行程序法规定和证据规则的条件下,知识产权遭受侵犯的被害人根本无法提供足够的证据来证明被告人的犯罪行为。因此,中国在今后制定或修改法律时,应当确立新的举证责任分配原则,从根本上减轻知识产权犯罪案件刑事自诉人的举证负担。The up-date judicial interpretation has made it clearer about stipulations on both public and private prosecution of crimes against intellectual property right, which aims to protect the victims' right of prosecution by themselves in such cases. Nevertheless, private prosecution cases of intellectual property right are rare in judicial practice. The author holds that it is impossible for the victims, whose intellectual property right are infringed by the crime, to provide sufficient evidences to prove the defendants' criminal behavior under the procedural laws and evidence rules in operation. Therefore, it is necessary for China to establish new ride of distribution of evidential burden when new law is enacted or the current law is amended in the future, so as to diminish the evidential burden of private prosecutor in criminal cases of intellectual property right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.1.201