城市与农村学龄儿童个性行为特征比较  

Comparative Study of Personality and Behavior Characteristics between Urban and Rural School Children

作　　者：王振英[1] 吕应春[2] 张朝辉[3] 陈佐明[3] 

机构地区：[1]河南省精神病医院医保科,河南新乡453002 [2]河南省精神病医院精神科,河南新乡453002 [3]河南省精神病医院心理科,河南新乡453002

出　　处：《实用儿科临床杂志》2007年第19期1495-1496,共2页Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics

基　　金：河南省教育厅科研立项课题(200510472020)

摘　　要：目的了解农村和城市学龄儿童个性和行为特征。方法随机抽取农村和城市学龄儿童各90例作为调查对象,采用艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)儿童版和父母用Achenbach行为量表(CBCL)儿童版作为评定工具进行测评。EPQ在统一指导语下由学龄儿童自行完成,CBCL由其父母填写。二组量表评分结果以城乡男女二组分别进行统计学分析。结果1.EPQ 4个维度评分农村和城市学龄儿童间无显著性差异(Pa>0.05);2.CBCL评分农村学龄女童退缩、社交因子分显著高于城市学龄女童(t=3.42,3.41 Pa<0.05),农村学龄男童违纪、攻击和外向因子分显著高于城市学龄男童(t=4.02,3.19,2.62 Pa<0.05)。结论农村和城市学龄儿童在个性方面无显著性差异,但农村学龄儿童存在较多行为问题,这些行为问题可能与其所受教养和生活方式有关。Objective To explore the personality and behavior characteristics between urban and rural school children. Methods Ninety urban1 school children and 90 rural ones randomly were selected, and measured with Eysenck Personality Questionnaire （EPQ） and Achenbach＇ s Child Behavior Checklist（CBCL）. The EPQ were completed by themselves under unified instruction and the CBCL by their parents, scores of t - test and variability analysis conducted according to gender. Results 1, There was no significant difference in 4 dimension scores of the EPQ between urban and rural school children （ Pa 〉 0.05 ） ;2. Withdrawal and social scores of the CBCL were significantly higher in rural girls than those in the urban ones （t = 3, 42,3.41 Pa 〈 0.05 ）, while violating discipline, aggression and extroversion scores in rural boys were greatly higher than those in the urban ones （ t = 4.02,3.19,2.62 Pa 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion There is no significant difference in personality between rural and urban school children, but rural children have more behavioral problems which may be related to their education and life style.

关 键 词：农村 城市 个性行为 艾森克个性问卷 行为量表儿童版 学龄儿童 

分 类 号：B844.1[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]