自体牙移植术后不同固定方法的效果评价  

Comparison of Four Kinds of Fixation Methods after Autotransplantation of Mature Teeth:a Retrospective Study

作　　者：陈志方[1] 黄忠琐 赵兵[1] 陶李明[1] 吴建华[1] 张晏更[1] 颜传杰 

机构地区：[1]合肥市口腔医院,安徽合肥230001

出　　处：《广东牙病防治》2007年第10期464-466,共3页Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment

基　　金：合肥市科委医药卫生类重点资助项目(20051001)

摘　　要：目的比较自体牙移植术后4种固定方法的临床效果。方法32例牙移植患者,根据固定方式分为钢丝结扎、牙弓夹板结扎、邻牙釉质黏接和正畸片段弓固定4组,对临床效果进行评价。结果钢丝结扎稳定性差;牙弓夹板和邻牙釉质黏接稳定性虽好,但临床塑型、牙面黏接、术后的松动度检查和拆除固定困难;正畸片段弓克服了以上缺点,但是初期稳定性不足。结论自体牙移植术后可根据实际情况选择不同的牙固定方法,正畸片段弓是相对比较理想的固定方式。Objective To compare the reliability and effect of four kinds of fixation methods after autogenous tooth transplantation. Methods Thirty-two patients with autogenous tooth transplantation were separated into four groups according to different fixation methods, i.e. ,segmental arch, wire fixation, dental splint and enamel bonding. The clinic effects were compared among four groups. Results Better earlier stability and effect can be obtained with dental splint and enamel bonding than other 2 methods. However, the segmental arch was more suitable in physiology characteristic comideration. Condusion Autogenous tooth transplantation can select appropriate fixation methods, whereas segmental arch may be a better choice.

关 键 词：牙移植 结扎固定 片段弓 牙弓夹板 

分 类 号：R782.12[医药卫生—口腔医学]