关于医学论文的“论著”界定原则与晋升职称申报中对“论著”要求的探讨  

How to define original articles of medical theses and its relation with professional title promotion

作　　者：何兴华[1] 李光明[1] 范昕建[2] 

机构地区：[1]<西部医学>编辑部,四川成都610041 [2]教育部人类疾病生物治疗重点实验室成都中医药大学,四川成都610075

出　　处：《西部医学》2007年第6期1218-1221,共4页Medical Journal of West China

摘　　要：医学论文中的"论著"如何界定?已成为作者、读者、编者、晋升职称申报者,以及职改办工作人员的一大热点、焦点问题,已引发不少争议,甚至导致了一些不愉快的事件发生。鉴于此,本文再就医学论文中的"论著"界定原则与相关知识作一概述,并就晋升职称申报中对"论著"的要求与如何正确认识"核心期刊"的问题进行探讨,以供参阅、借鉴。How to define original articles of medical theses has become a focus concerned by authors, readers, editors, as well as those applying professional title promotion and relevant staff responsible for this kind of work. This issue unfortunately has resulted in some dispute, even unhappy or disharmonious events. Accordingly this article aims at expounding the principles of how to define and correctly understand original articles and core journals.

关 键 词：论著 界定原则 医学论文 论文体载 核心期刊 

分 类 号：R199.2[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]