“理之争”还是“利之争”——从“秀才遇到兵,有理说不清”所想到的  

The Arguement on "Reasoning or Benefit"

作　　者：张联朋[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西工业职业技术学院,陕西咸阳712000

出　　处：《河北理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第4期5-8,共4页Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要："秀才遇到兵,有理说不清"并不是因为兵太傻,蛮不讲理,而是因为双方未能形成共同认可的"理"。秀才与兵为了自身的利益从不同的角度提出了理的两个标准——语言之理和和拳头之理,两个标准则源于道理的主观性和多样性。在语言之理和拳头之理相争的背后实际是利益之争,而决定胜负的关键其实不在于谁更有理,而在于谁更有"力"。最大的力代表公利和正当之利的正义之力。＂When a reasonable person meets a rude person, nothing to reason＂. This is not because the rude person is silly, or hard to reason but because they didn＇t have anything in common. They put forth two standards of reasoning from their own angles of benefit reasoning with language and reasoning with fist. The two standards originates the reasoning＇ s subjective and varieties. Actually between the reasoning of language and the fist is the arguement of benefit. The key to determine who will win is not because who is right, but because who is ＂forceful＂. The author thinks the biggest force represents the common benefit and the right benefit. The article expresses his own idea based on this clue and some social phenomena.

关 键 词：理和利 两个标准 

分 类 号：C912.1[经济管理]