法律实证主义与法哲学的安乐死  

The Legal Positivism and the Euthanasia of the Philosophy of Rights

作　　者：刘日明[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学 人文学院,上海200092

出　　处：《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第5期79-84,共6页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"马克思法哲学理论的当代意义研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:06CZX001)

摘　　要：法律实证主义有其自身的悖论。它批判了自然法传统中法的不确定性和任意性,以自己的方式拒斥了传统的法的形而上学,并促使了法律的客观化和精确化。但是,它的理论基础和目标诉求是可疑的,并与自然法学说一样仍然分享了西方形而上学传统的种种前提,也导致了法的绝对技术理性化以及权力与法、法律与法一体化的后果。社会主义和谐社会构建中的法治建设在吸取法律实证主义的理论成就的同时,要尽力避免其可能导致的"法哲学的安乐死"倾向。The legal positivism has its own paradox. It criticizes the non-determinism and arbitrariness of the natural legal philosophy, repels the traditional legal metaphysics, urges the law to be objective and precise. But, its rationale and goal are suspicious. It still shares the premises of the western metaphysics with the natural legal theory, and leads to absolute technical rationalization as well as authority and law, legal and law integration. Construction of rule by law in the harmonious society must avoid the tendency of ＂euthanasia of the legal philosophy ＂ which may be caused by the legal positivism when we absorb its theoretical achievement.

关 键 词：技术理性 法的确定性 法的价值性 法哲学的安乐死 

分 类 号：B82-051[哲学宗教—伦理学]