氟离子导入治疗牙本质敏感症的临床研究  

Clinical effect of fluoride iontophoresis on dentine hypersensitivity

作　　者：周红文[1] 陈亚明[1] 祁惠兰[2] 任长海[2] 陈丽娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学口腔医学研究所,南京医科大学附属口腔医院修复科,南京210029 [2]南京医科大学康达总公司,南京210029

出　　处：《口腔医学》2007年第10期523-524,共2页Stomatology

基　　金：江苏高校高新技术产业发展项目(JH03-026)

摘　　要：目的探讨氟离子导入法治疗牙本质敏感症的临床疗效。方法51例牙本质敏感症患者共61对磨牙,将每对磨牙随机分为实验组和对照组。分别采用氟离子导入法和Gluma涂擦法脱敏。记录治疗前后即刻、1周和1个月时的数字化疼痛评判法(visual analogue scale,VAS)的差值,计算两种方法的有效率并进行统计学分析。结果氟离子导入法术后即刻、1周和1个月时有效率分别为86.89%、81.97%、80.33%;Gluma涂擦法分别为90.16%、78.69%、78.69%。两组在即刻、1周和1个月时的有效率呈下降趋势,但术后同一时间两组间有效率无显著差异。结论氟离子导入法治疗牙齿敏感症与Gluma涂擦法在疗效上无显著差异,可用于临床的脱敏治疗。Objective To investigate the curative effect of fluoride iontophoresis on treating dentine hypersensitivity. Methods 61 pairs of molars from 51 patients with dentine hypersensitivity were divided into two groups randomly. One group was given with fluoride iontophoresis, and the other with Gluma. The VAS differences were recorded instantly after one week and one month, and the data were analyzed. Results The effective rate of the group with fluoride iontophoresis were 86.89%, 81.97 % and 80.33% （instantly, one-week and one-month） ;the effective rate of the group with Gluma were 90.16 %, 78.69 % and 78.69 %, respectively. The effective rates of both groups were declining with time. There were no significant differences between two groups at the same time points after treatment. Conclusion There was no significant difference of the curative effect between the methods of fluoride iontophoresis and Gluma. The method of fluoride iontophoresis is alternative to treat the dentine hypersensitivity.

关 键 词：牙本质敏感症 氟离子导入法 Gluma涂擦法 

分 类 号：R781.2[医药卫生—口腔医学]