检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨丙宏[1]
出 处:《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》2007年第5期65-68,共4页Journal of Huan Public Security College
摘 要:法学界倡导我国实施刑事和解制度,实务界也有推广的趋势。将刑事和解制度放在和谐社会背景下和整个中国法治进程、宪政建设中,遵循诉讼平衡理念,分析刑事和解的效率价值,我们发现我国移植这种制度尚不具备相应的理念基础、制度体系和社会环境,刑事和解在我国现有环境下不宜施行。但我们可以对其合理成分进行借鉴与吸收,坚定刑事法治理念,探索建立被害人援助制度和补偿制度,进一步完善诉讼程序设计。Circles of law science advocate that the system of criminal reconciliation be carried out in our country and the circles of practice also begin to popularize it. Putting the system of criminal reconciliation under the background of harmonious society and the whole country's riding - by - law course as well as the construction of constitutional government, abiding by the concept of balanced litigation and analyzing the efficiency value of criminal reconciliation ,we find that our country does not has the corresponding concept basis,institutional system and social environment. So it's not suitable to adopt the criminal reconciliation in our country under the present situation. However, we can analyze its reasonable elements and learn from them, strengthen the concept of criminal reconciliation, explore the assistance and compensation system of the victims, and further improve the design of litigation procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71