证据制度改革中的几个基本问题  

Several Basic Problems in Evidence System Reform

作　　者：陈桂明[1] 纪格非[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872 [2]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2007年第6期146-154,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"民事诉讼法典修订的理论研究与制度设计"(05BFX046)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：证据制度与诉讼制度需要相互协调,为此应当建立与我国诉讼模式相适应的证据失权制度、举证协助义务、强制答辩制度和阐明权制度。在构建证据规则体系时,对于基于证据力弱而限制证据使用的规则应持谨慎态度,必须认真考虑从立法角度概括地排除某一种类的证据可能给个案公正造成的不良影响,或不采用这样的规则而将问题交由法官决定或明确列举不予适用排除规则的例外情况。证据立法应尽量选择通俗易懂的方式,立法语言的精英化只能造成法律与大众的疏离,社会需要的不仅是一个逻辑严密、体系完整的规则体系,更要求这一体系能够贴近大众。In order to coordinate the evidence system and litigation system, the systems of evidence invalid, evidence assistance duty, compulsory defense and statement right should be suited to the Chinese litigation mode. In constructing the evidence rule system, we should briefly get rid of the harmful influence upon the particular justice by one kind of evidence with a weaker weight of proof from the legislation angle and either left it for judges to decide or clearly enumerate the exceptional situations of exclusive rule. The evidence legislation should be better to select the popular mode and press close to the public.

关 键 词：证据 举证协助义务 排除规则 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]