厉鹗与朱彝尊“清空”词风之差异及文化探源  

Stylistic Differences of the Art “Qing Kong” Between Li'e and Zhu Yizun

作　　者：周潇[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛大学师范学院中文系,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2007年第2期133-137,153,共6页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：“清空”被清代浙派词家标为艺术至境,对“清空”艺术的追求,在不同作家手中呈现为不同的风貌。中期的宗主和巨匠厉鹗在审美趣味上偏好“孤淡”,取境萧疏,意象冷寂,用字寒瘦,形成清幽冷峭的特色;浙派早期领袖朱彝尊则趋向“傅采”,形成深情绵缈的风格。这是由于二人在性情品操、生平经历、爱情生活、文化底蕴等方面的差异造成的。从浙派“雅正”、“清空”的论词标准看,樊榭词才是其真正代表。Zhe Ci （Ci-poetry） School is one of the most important sects in Qing Dynasty. Its writers believe that ＂Qing Kong＂ is the supreme realm of art. The art of ＂Qing Kong＂ displays different styles by different writers. Works of Li＇e, the leader as well as the most important writer in the persuasion, look bleak and desolate while those of Zhu Yizun, an early leader of Zhe Ci School, appear mild and genial. This results from some differences between them such as temperament, moral character, experiences in life, love, aesthetic taste and so on. According to Zhe Ci School＇s creating standards which advocate ＂Ya Zheng＂ and ＂Qing Kong＂, the works of Li＇e deserve its real representative. Li＇e develops the aesthetic theory of Zhe Ci School to its summit. And from then on Zhe Ci School declines.

关 键 词：朱彝尊 厉鹗 浙派词 清词 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]