三谈今本《大唐新语》的真伪问题  

A Third Approach to the Authenticity of the Extant Edition of New Anecdotes of the Tang Dynasty

作　　者：吴冠文[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学古籍所,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2007年第1期20-29,82,共11页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：在笔者发表了《关于今本“〈大唐新语〉”的真伪问题》(本刊2004年第1期)后,对于今本《大唐新语》的真伪问题已展开了较热烈的讨论。本文是对讨论中所出现的一些问题的评述,并进一步论证了今本《大唐新语》之为伪书。A heated discussion has been aroused after the present author＇s paper ＂On the Authenticity of the Extant Edition of New Anecdotes of the Tang Dynasty＂ was published in Fudan Journal, No. 1, 2004. As a reply to Yang Guangjiao＇s critical response, this paper provides more problematic points concerning the classification of the content and the deadlines of the writings in the book, which further prove that New Anecdotes of the Tang Dynasty was written in the Ming Dynasty by someone under the name of Liu Su. The paper also points out that the method used in Yang＇s article is not generally fit for a logical argument.

关 键 词：刘肃 《大唐新语》 《唐世说新语》 真伪 

分 类 号：K206[历史地理—历史学]