检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2007年第6期36-41,共6页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学"十五"规划项目(01JA630048)成果之一
摘 要:随着全球创业投资业的复苏,近年来我国很多大型老牌企业纷纷加入了创业投资的行列,其进入渠道各有不同。不同的渠道对应的是不同的投资程序和投资管理过程,最终会对签约成本、投资项目目标的实现程度、监管协调成本以及可选择的投资项目的数量和质量产生决定性影响。大型老牌企业怎样选择投资于创业企业的渠道?从交易成本理论和战略管理理论的角度出发,比较两类介入模式的优势和成本,融合资源本位企业观的相关研究成果,可得出如下结论:企业主导型创业投资(简称CVC)是大型老牌企业和创业企业的一种权益型战略联盟,采用组建附属的创业投资基金或子公司的形式更能实现联盟的利益。With the invigoration of the global venture capital industry,many large established firms in China investe in small entrepreneurial firms through all kinds of channels.Investment process and management of corporate venture capital programs will be decided by investment channels which will finally influence the cost of signing contracts,the degree of realizing investment objective,the cost of monitoring and control,as well as the quantity and quality of investment programs.Based on the transactional cost theory and the strategy management theory,this paper discuses how to choose investment channels of corporate venture capital programs.After comparing benefits and costs of two kinds of investment channels,we argue that CVC is a kind of equity strategic alliance,and the forms of venture capital funds or subsidiary companies are more likely to achieve profits of strategic alliance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117