检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学,陕西西安710049 [2]中油西北销售公司,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《管理工程学报》2007年第4期24-30,共7页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70571063)
摘 要:本文从战略导向的角度出发,研究了企业的创新选择和管理控制方式选择问题。从战略思维和组织学习两个方面对企业家导向和市场导向在创新程度和管理控制方式上的不同进行了分析,提出概念模型和理论假设。利用从10个省市不同行业得到的585家企业有效样本数据的分析,验证了本文的理论模型。分析结果表明,企业家导向更加注重突破式创新并通过战略控制对其进行管理,而市场导向更加注重渐进创新并通过财务控制对其进行管理。分析结果还表明虽然企业家导向与渐进创新没有直接关系,但却可以通过财务控制方式鼓励企业中渐进创新的出现。Based on the heterogeneous strategic orientations, the paper analyzed how varied strategic orientations affect the selections of different styles of innovation and control systems. First, literature review was proposed, and the hypotheses were developed. Then, using a sample of 585 member firms from 8 provinces in china, we tested our model and hypotheses. These results suggest that entrepreneurial orientation has positive but indirect effects on radical innovation and incremental innovation, while market orientation has direct and indirect effects on incremental innovation and indirect negative effects on radical innovation. The results also suggest that market orientated firms play emphasis on financial controls but strategic controls, while entrepreneurial orientated firms play emphasis on both strategic controls and financial controls which confirm the importance of business group in firms' innovation in transition economy. These findings provide important insights to the understanding of innovation in transitional China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15