检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈海军[1] 于淑湘[1] 朱孝春 钱奇春[1] 南福清 林均舟[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第97医院口腔科 [2]解放军73068部队卫生队
出 处:《东南国防医药》2007年第5期327-328,共2页Military Medical Journal of Southeast China
摘 要:目的研究不同树脂粘结剂的机械强度差异。方法分别制作不同树脂粘结剂的压缩强度试件及径向抗张强度试样,测其压缩强度和径向抗张强度,统计分析所得数据。结果Panavia F树脂粘结剂的压缩强度明显高于实验组,两者的径向抗张强度间无显著性差异。结论充分固化后两种树脂水门汀的径向抗张强度无显著性差异;实验树脂水门汀压缩强度达到ADA规定标准。Objective To study the difference of mchanical strength between different resin cement. Methods The specimens for compress strength test and diametral tensile strength test were made and divided according to different color. Then the specimens were tested with universal testing machine. Datas were analyzed with ANOVA. Results There was no significance between two resin cements on diametral tensile strength. The compress strength of Panavia F cement was higher than that of experiment cement. Conclusion There is no significance between two resin cements on diametral tensile strength, The compress strength of experimental resin cement can reach the standard of ADA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15