检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李敏[1] 朴建华[1] 刘健敏[1] 田颖[1] 孙锐[1] 杨晓光[1]
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心营养与食品安全所,北京100050
出 处:《中国食品卫生杂志》2007年第6期512-514,共3页Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene
基 金:国家科技部科技基础性工作专项资金项目(2001DEA30035)
摘 要:目的评估Fitmate便携式肺功能测试仪测定RMR的可靠性。方法采用Douglas-Haldane法对该仪器进行比对研究。随机抽取了16名23~28岁年龄组健康研究生作为受试者,男女各8名。结果研究发现两种仪器测定男女学生RMR值经配对t检验分析,P值分别为0.4027、0.6358,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);经相关性检验,相关系数分别为0.75(P=0.0033)、0.63(P=0.0112),相关性良好(P〈0.05)。结论Fitmate便携式肺功能测试仪测定RMR的结果可靠。Objective To assess the validity and reliability of RMR determined by FitMate. Method A validation study of FitMate was devised to compare with the Douglas-Haldane method, which was the classical method for gas metabolism. Sixteen healthy graduates at the age of 23 to 28 years were randomly selected, including eight males and eight females. Results The difference of RMR determined by Douglas-Haldane and FitMate (P 〉 0.05) was not found, the P value of paired t test of RMR of male and female were 0.402 7 and 0.635 8, respectively. By correlation analysis, the correlation coefficients of RMR of male and female determined by two instruments were 0.75 (P = 0.003 3) and 0.63 (P = 0.011 2), respectively, which had significant correlation ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The FitMate could make reliable RMR measurement.
分 类 号:R15[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学] R333.6[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145