检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学电子信息与控制工程学院,北京100022
出 处:《交通运输系统工程与信息》2007年第6期45-50,共6页Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(60604008);北京市自然科学基金(4072005)
摘 要:基于对城市快速路入口匝道控制问题的分析,用微观交通仿真软件PARAMICS建立入口匝道控制仿真模型,对三种入口匝道控制算法(ALINEA,NEW-CONTROL和MIXED-CONTROL)进行仿真对比研究.结果表明三种算法都能一定程度上改善快速路的交通拥挤.同时给出三种算法的差异性描述,从交通流特征和算法特点分析产生差异的原因.最后指出MIXED-CONTROL在优化主线交通流的同时减少了入口匝道的车辆排队长度,其在高需求时的总体性能优于其它两种算法,是比较适合于实际应用的匝道感应控制算法.Based on the analysis of urban freeway on-ramp control, an on-ramp model is developed and simulated via the microscopic transportation simulation software PARAMICS using three on-ramp control Mgorithms (ALINEA, NEW-CONTROL, and MIXED-CONTROL). The results indicate that all of these algorithms can effectively ameliorate the traffic congestion on the freeway. The differences of these algorithms are also analyzed from the aspect of characteristics of traffic flow and algorithms. MIXED-CONTROL not only optimizes the traffic flow on the mainline but also reduces the vehicle queue of the on-ramp, which is superior to other two control strategies especially in the case of high-demand. The evidence provides that MIXED-CONTROL is a better traffic responsive ramp metering algorithms for real-world implementation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222