活血化瘀法治疗急性出血性中风临床回顾性分析  

Retrospective Analysis on Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke Treated with the Method of Promoting Blood Circulation and Removing Blood Stasis

作　　者：陈志刚[1] 王双玲[2] 孟繁兴[1] 韩刚[1] 林参[1] 郭蓉娟[1] 张允岭[1] 唐启盛[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学东方医院神经科,北京100078 [2]北京市通州区中医院,北京101100

出　　处：《中国中医药信息杂志》2007年第7期15-17,共3页Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的观察急性出血性中风临床证候学特点及回顾性分析活血化瘀方法治疗急性出血性中风的临床疗效、安全性。方法按是否在急性期运用活血化瘀方法将急性出血性中风患者分为治疗组及对照组,对2组患者进行证候学分析,并进行血瘀证积分比较;以1个月为观察终点,统计分析2组患者的临床疗效。结果6种基本证候中血瘀证在治疗前后出现频率最多。治疗组有效率高于对照组,病死率低于对照组。卡方检验结果P>0.05,无统计学意义。结论活血化瘀法治疗急性出血性中风确有一定疗效。Objective To observe the clinical syndrome characters of acute hemorrhagic stroke （AHS） and systematically assess the efficacy of remedy of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis （PBC＆RBS） for AHS. Methods All cases were divided into two groups： cases treated with normal medicine were regarded as the control group （30 cases） and which treated with drugs of PBC＆RBS based on normal medicine were regarded as the treatment group （47cases）. By analyzing and contrasting syndrome scores of two groups, the clinical efficacy was evaluated at the end of one month treatment. Results The mostly encounted clinical syndrome of six principal syndromes included in the TCM Apoplexy Diagnostic Criteria was blood stasis syndrome. The efficacy of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group, and the mortality of the treatment group was lower than that of the control group, but no statistical significances （P〉0.05）. Conclusion Blood stasis syndrome is more common in AHS. PBC＆RBS had some effects on AHS.

关 键 词：活血化瘀法 回顾性分析 急性出血性中风 

分 类 号：R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]