检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪专[1] 冯继锋[1] 陈嘉[1] 陈环球[2] 周兆飞[1] 潘良熹[1] 黄富麟[1] 郑秀立[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省肿瘤医院内科,南京210009 [2]江苏省肿瘤医院普外科,210009
出 处:《临床肿瘤学杂志》2007年第12期933-935,937,共4页Chinese Clinical Oncology
摘 要:目的:观察比较LFTP方案与ECF方案治疗晚期胃癌的客观疗效及毒副反应。方法:56例Ⅳ期胃癌随机分成两组。LFTP方案组27例,采用亚叶酸钙(CF)100mgiv,d1、d8、d15;氟苷(FUDR)500mg/m2iv维持6小时,d1、d8、d15;多西紫杉醇(DTX)35mg/m2iv维持1小时,d2、d9、d16;顺铂(PDD)30mg/m2iv,d3、d10、d17。ECF方案组29例,采用CF100mgivd1~d5;氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)500mg/m2iv维持6小时,d1~d5;表阿霉素(EPI)50mg/m2iv,d2;PDD30mg/m2iv,d3~d5。两组均4周为1个周期,2周期后按照WHO标准统一评定疗效及毒副反应。结果:LFTP组:CR0例,PR16例,NC9例,PD2例,有效率为59.3%(16/27),PD率7.4%(2/27);ECF组:CR0例,PR15例,NC4例,PD10例,有效率为51.7%(15/29),PD率34.5%(10/29)。两组有效率比较无显著性差异(P=0.1814),LFTP组PD率明显低于ECF组(P=0.0126)。两组毒副反应多表现为Ⅰ~Ⅱ度,其中口腔炎LFTP组29.7%(8/27)、ECF组55.2%(16/29),LFTP组低于ECF组(P=0.0346);腹泻LFTP组25.9%(8/27)、ECF组55.2%(15/29),LFTP组低于ECF组(P=0.0321)。结论:LFTP方案较ECF方案治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效较好,毒副反应可以耐受,值得进一步研究。Objective:To evaluate the objective anti-tumor efficacy and safety of sequential weekly dose of floxuridine (FUDR) with leucovorin, docetaxel, cisplatin contrast with ECF regimen for advanced gastric cancer. Methods:Fifty-six cases of advanced gastric cancer were divided into 2 groups, LFTP group and ECF group. LFTP group used CF 100mg iv d1,d8,d15, FUDR 500mg/m^2 iv d1,d8,d15, docetaxel 35mg/m^2 iv d2,d9,d16, cisplatin 30mg/m^2 iv d3,d10,d17. ECF group used CF 100mg iv d1-d5, 5-FU 500mg/m^2 iv d1-d5, EPI 50mg/m^2 iv d2, cisplatin 30mg/m^2 iv d3,d4,d5, this regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. All the patients were received 2 cycles. Results:LFTP group: 59.3%(16/27)of response rate were achieved with PD 7.4%(2/27),in all 27 cases; ECF group: 51.7%(15/29) (P=0.181 4) of response rate were achieved with PD 34.5%(10/29) (P=0.012 6) in all 29 cases. The major toxicity included mucositis, diarrhea, phlebitis, nausea vomiting, neutropenia. Among side effects mucositis was the most common seen. Most were grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ which were tolerable for all patients. Conclusion:The regimen was an effective chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, the adverse reactions were not severe, further clinical study should be warranted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249