检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹来宾[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 王安明[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 徐爱德[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 何树岗 田维泽 江志勇 许祖闪[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 吴树森 王天保[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 陈宝仓[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 高士伟 王学庆 田军 孟凡录[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 李先启 庄悦新 秦东京[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 殷焕起 唐志学[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 臧宝江[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 唐桂长 崔华兴[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 徐万峰 李会祥 王国华 周海舟[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] 周韶龙 衣建安[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]
机构地区:[1]青岛医学院附属医院 [2]山东省莱州市人民医院 [3]山东省文登市中心医院 [4]郑州市骨科医院 [5]山东省临沂市人民医院 [6]山东省立医院 [7]河南省中原油田中心医院 [8]山东省滨州医学院附属医院 [9]山东省菏泽地区医院 [10]湖南省娄底市人民医院 [11]山东省济宁市人民医院 [12]山东省营市人民医院 [13]山东省蒙阴县人民医院 [14]山东省沂水县中心医院 [15]青岛市立医院 [16]河南省中牟县人民医院 [17]山东省莱州市肿瘤防治中心 [18]山东省栖霞县人民医院
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》1997年第8期547-551,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiology
摘 要:目的:分析1047例骨转移瘤X线、放射计算机体层摄影(ECT)、CT及MRI表现,并比较其敏感性及特异性。材料和方法:原发肿瘤主要为肺癌(28.75%),乳腺癌(12.03%)及鼻咽癌(5.06%)等,27.03%来源不明。X线诊断988例,ECT检查126例,CT扫描97例,MRI扫描47例。结果:X线显示骨转移部位为脊椎、肋骨、四肢近段及颅骨。ECT表现多骨多处浓集灶(82.54%)或单发浓集灶(16.67%),仅1例表现为稀疏病灶。MRIT1WI表现低信号(80.85%)或其他异常信号(19.15%);T2WI呈高信号(68.85%)或其他异常信号(31.15%)。结论:MRI及ECT敏感性高于CT和X线。MRI、CT及X线特异性高于ECT。骨转移瘤首选ECT并结合X线检查,必要时做CT或(和)MRI检查。Purpose:To analyse and compare the fingings, sensitivity and specificity of conventional radiography, ECT, CT and MRI in the diagnosis of 1 047 cases with bone metastases. Materials and methods: The most common sources of skeletal metastases were carcinomas of the lung (28.75%), breast (12.03%), nasopharynx (5.06%) and unknown origin (27.03%). The plain films revealed 988 cases of bone metastases. 126 cases underwent ECT and 97 cases CT examination, 47 cases were examined by MRI. Results:The most commonly involved bones were the spine, ribs and pelvis on the plain films. ECT manifested multiple abnormal foci of increased radionuclide activity (82.54%), single focus (16.67%), and one case of photopenic metastasis. MRI demonstrated decreased signal intensity (80.85%) and other abnormal signal intensity (19.15%) on T 1WI and increased signal intensity (68.85%) and other abnormal signal intensity (31.15%) on T 2WI. The sensitivity of MRI and ECT was significantly higher than that of CT and X ray. However, the specificity of MRI, CT and X ray were significantly higher than that of ECT. Conclusion:ECT in combination with conventional radiograph should be the initial imaging modalities for bone metastases supplemented if necessary by CT or MRI.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15