检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶燕格[1] 宋乃平[1] 王磊[1] 刘艳华[1]
机构地区:[1]宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建省部共建教育部重点实验视,西部生态研究中心,银川750021
出 处:《资源科学》2008年第1期114-118,共5页Resources Science
基 金:国家社科基金项目:“禁牧政策的生态效益补偿与草地资源可持续利用研究”(批准号:04XJY011)
摘 要:生态等值分析法(简称HEA法)作为一种对自然资源损坏后做出准确损失效果评估,从而制定恢复实施方案的方法,其特点是原理清晰、参数较少、简单易用、实施便捷,所以在国外应用的领域比较广泛,也得到科学研究领域和社会法制界的认同,但目前在我国应用的较少。文章首先介绍了生态等值分析的概念和基本原理及组成部分,其次对该方法的相关因素进行了梳理和总结,然后以案例的方式分别从开始恢复时间、完成恢复时间和最大恢复服务水平三个角度的数据调整对该方法做了初步的探索应用,最后从实施、技术、经济三个方面对该方法在我国能否实际应用进行了讨论。结果表明,由于在技术条件、产权环境、经济背景等方面国内与国外存在一定的差异,所以HEA法在我国的确认和应用还需要一个探索的过程,并会随着生态补偿问题研究的深入而显得更加迫切。Habitat equivalency analysis (HEA) has been widely used for assessing land degradation at home and abroad. This paper reviewed the methodology in terms of conceptual framework, components of the method and summarized the factors affecting the method application. A case study was conducted to test the methodology. In the case study, data in terms of start period of grassland restoration, duration for grassland restoration and maximum level of the grassland restoration was tested through the application the method. The discussions on the method use in operational, technical and economic aspects were conducted to determine its potential application in China. It is concluded that the method cannot be used to accurately assess the grassland degradation in a number of cases in China because of the great disparities in terms of technical condition, ownership and economic background between China and other countries. A series of further studies on the method use is imperative with the deepening of ecological compensation research.
分 类 号:X171[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3