检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张怡[1]
出 处:《审计与经济研究》2008年第1期87-92,共6页Journal of Audit & Economics
摘 要:按照国际清算银行(BIS)颁布的新资本充足率规范,以49个中国证券公司实际自营投资组合为样本、采用基于VaR的内部模型法,估算各证券公司自营投资的市场风险和应计提资本,并以之检验中国证券公司新老资本监管制度的有效性。实证结果显示:改革后的2006版资本监管制度比老制度有所改善,但对风险的反映不如内部模型法准确,中国监管制度改革的方向应是采用内部模型法。因主要品种风险调整比例设置偏低,新制度平均低估证券公司自营风险29%,建议监管规则调整上海180指数股票、ST类股票、基金、企业债、可转债等品种的风险调整比例。This study is based on the 1996 BIS capital adequacy guidelines to employ the VaR based internal model method to calculate the VaR and the capital requirement using data on the actual fixed income security and equity security holdings of 85 security finns in China. We examine how these models fit security finns by comparing the new regulatory rules implemented by the China Securities Regulatory Commission(CSRC) in 2006 with the old ones in 2000. The empirical results show that the 2006 regulatory rules perform better than the old ones, but reflect the risk less accurately than the internal model. CSRC tends to adopt the internal model to calculate the capital requirements of security firms in the future. The risks discount ratio of main assets in the new regulatory system has been set lower, so the 85 securities finns' trading book risk has been underestimated by 29 per cent on average. The study suggests that China's securities regulatory authority should make some adjustment on the risks discount ratio of Shanghai 180 index stock, fund, firm bond and transferable bond.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147