钱锺书“诠释循环”与西方诠释学的关系辨析  

A comparative study of hermeneutic cycle by Qian Zhongshu and hermeneutics in the west

作　　者：何明星[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学中国语言文化学院,广东广州510420

出　　处：《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第1期61-65,共5页Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：广州市十一五社科规划项目(06-B8-2);广东外语外贸大学学术创新团队项目(GW2006-TB-0004)的阶段成果

摘　　要：李清良新近发表的文章认为:钱锺书的"诠释循环"对西方诠释学虽有所借鉴,但更多的是"不谋而合"、"不期而同"的"冥契暗合",这种"借鉴"只是"提法"即命名上的,至于实质内容,则是钱锺书从自己的学术旨趣学术经历出发而形成的,与西方诠释学没有直接关系,而且钱锺书"并不像某些研究者所说的非常熟悉西方阐释学"。因此无论从钱锺书对西方诠释学的了解程度进行反面印证,还是从他自己的学术旨趣学术经历作正面推论,都不能证明钱锺书自己形成了"诠释循环"方法。钱锺书的"诠释循环"是他有意识地借鉴西方诠释学理论发展中国传统诠释方法的结果。Li Qingliang claims lately that the hermeneutic cycle by Qian Zhongshu and hermeneutics in the west are coincidentally ＂similar＂, but different in substance, and that Qian Zhongshu obtains his hypothesis of hermeneutic cycle on his own academic pursuant, having little to do with the western hermeneutics. However, the writer of this paper argues for a positive speculation of the development of the Chinese hermeneutics by Qian Zhongshu and his borrowing of western learning.

关 键 词：钱锺书 西方诠释学 “诠释循环” 

分 类 号：I0-05[文学—文学理论]