实践美学与后实践美学论说之维——《实践美学与后实践美学在论争中发展》读后  

On Practical Aesthetics and Post-practical Aesthetics

作　　者：刘琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中文系,上海200433

出　　处：《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》2008年第1期67-70,共4页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：林朝霞博士在《实践美学与后实践美学在论争中发展》一文中追溯了实践美学和后实践美学交锋和各自发展的历程,理出了实践美学和后实践美学及新实践美学在争鸣中发展的学理脉络。但是,作为对当代中国美学发展的概观和综述,该文把实践美学和后实践美学的论争从对立和斗争的角度谈论,忽略了后实践美学和新实践美学是在实践美学的基础上发展以及各美学流派是在中国当下文化语境中发展的事实。文章不乏对后实践美学的褒扬之辞,但没有正视后实践美学理论本身的缺陷。本文认为对实践美学与后实践美学论争的论说要抓住几个关键问题,界定清楚概念和范畴,澄清论证交锋所在。In Dr. Lin Zhaoxia＇s thesis The Development of Practical Aesthetics and Post- practical Aesthetics in Its Debates cast back the debates of Practical Aesthetics and Post-practical Aesthetics, gave us a compact presentation of the two main opinions as well. However, this thesis is sometimes not of all -sides. It firstly emphasized the difference and rupture between Practical Aesthetics and Post-practical Aesthetics, but overlooked the fact that Practical Aesthetics provids a basis for Post-practical Aesthetics and the two theories are in the same context of today＇s culture. Secondly, to Post-practical Aesthetics too much compliments is attached but the defects of the theory are also ignored.

关 键 词：实践美学 后实践美学 论争 美学流派 

分 类 号：B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]