检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘仁东[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁警官高等专科学校公安技术系,辽宁大连116036
出 处:《辽宁警专学报》2008年第1期24-27,共4页Journal of Liaoning Police Academy
摘 要:证据制度历来被比作刑事诉讼的脊梁,是诉讼活动的基础、是全部司法活动的核心和灵魂。但由于立法的不完善,导致了我国在司法实践中证据制度缺乏可操作性。证据法学不仅是一门技术性很强的学科,而且对保障人权也至关重要。因此,对我国证据制度改革问题进行认真探索研究,对完善证据立法和指导司法实践,具有深刻的现实意义。文章从介绍证据立法的紧迫性和必要性入手,对完善证据立法的意义、构建模式、现行立法现状及存在的主要问题进行了系统的分析,并在参考借鉴国外相关成熟做法的基础上,结合我国的实际国情,提出相应的立法建议。The system of evidence has long been seen as the backbone of criminal litigation, the core and soul of all judicial activities. However, the imperfection of legislation leads to the shortage of evidence system in operating judicial practice. Evidence law is not only an academic subject, but a key practice to protect human rights. Therefore, it is of great significance to deeper analyze the reform of evidence system. Starting from introducing the emergency and necessity of evidence legislation, this article systematically analyzes the importance of perfecting evidence legislation, constructive mode, current legislative condition and its main problems. Based on referring matured practices from home and abroad, and relating to the realities of our country, the article proposes relative suggestions of legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28