检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《城市交通》2008年第1期67-70,64,共5页Urban Transport of China
基 金:国家科学技术部(2005BA414B10);北京市科学技术委员会(Y0605008040591)
摘 要:从适用性、优缺点等角度对道路网可靠性评价方法进行了比较分析,简要介绍了3种主要道路网可靠性评价指标:连通性、行程时间可靠性和路网容量可靠性。在此基础上,分析了国内外在求解这些评价指标的过程中所形成的5种评价方法:终端可靠性评估方法、博弈论技术、蒙特卡罗方法、吸收马尔科夫链方法和微观交通仿真方法。最后指出道路网可靠性指标与评价方法尚在研究阶段,现存的可靠性评价方法对于评价交通系统运营状态仍存在一些问题。This paper first introduces three primary indices for evaluating road network reliability: connectivity, travel time reliability, and network capacity reliability. With a review of the five different evaluation techniques to calculate these indices, including Terminal Reliability Estimation Methods, Game Theory, Monte Carlo Simulation, Absorbing Markov Chains, and Micro-simulation, a comparison of pros and cons across these techniques is made from a perspective of applicability. Finally, the paper points out, however, that the road network reliability indices and their evaluation methods are still in the course of further research, and yet the existing techniques are suffering shortcomings in evaluating operational status of transportation systems.
分 类 号:U491.13[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28