检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院,陕西西安710032
出 处:《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》2008年第1期12-14,共3页Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
摘 要:目的:比较肉眼和应用根管显微镜条件下,离体上颌第一磨牙近中颊根第二根管(MB2)的发现率,为推广根管显微镜的临床应用提供依据。方法:离体上颌第一磨牙共105个,分别肉眼下使用传统开髓口、改良开髓口,根管显微镜下探查寻找MB2,记录MB2发现率。结果:传统开髓口、改良开髓口和根管显微镜条件下,MB2的发现率分别为45.71%,54.29%,82.86%,肉眼下传统开髓口和改良开髓口MB2的发现率与应用根管显微镜时MB2的发现率存在显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:应用根管显微镜可以极大地提高MB2的发现率。AIM: To compare the detection rates of the 2nd mesiobuccal canal (MB2) of extracted maxillary first molar with or without microscope. METHODS: One humdred and five extracted maxillary first molars were divided into 3 groups for the detection of MB2 : group of traditional coronal cavity preparation ( group A) , group of improved coronal cavity preparation (group B) and group of coronal cavity preparetion by using root canal microscope (group C). Detection rates of the groups were recorded. RESULTS: The detection rates of MB2 of the 3 groups were 45.71% ,54.29% and 82.86% in group A, B and C respectively. Significant discrepancies were found among B them. CONCLUSION : Detection rate of MB2 can be greatly improved by the use of root canal microscope.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28