1007型萨勃心肺复苏机临床应用  

Research on the application of 1007-Thumper CPR system in the emergency treatment

作　　者：颜鲲[1] 唐国茂[1] 李亚勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅三医院急诊科,湖南长沙410013

出　　处：《中国现代医学杂志》2008年第1期87-89,共3页China Journal of Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较萨勃1007型心肺复苏机与传统的人工心肺复苏效果,以评价萨勃机在临床应用的价值。方法回顾性分析248例使用萨勃机心肺复苏患者和223例采用人工心肺复苏的患者,排除原发病、就诊时间影响因素后比较两种方法的心肺复苏成功率及存活率,并比较两种方法并发症发生率。结果萨勃心肺机复苏成功率、存活率较人工心肺复苏高,P<0.05,前者分别是34%、14%,后者为21%和5%,P<0.05;两者并发症发生率无显著差别,P<0.05。结论萨勃机是目前理想的一种完全可替代以往人工心肺复苏的新型仪器,值得临床推广使用。[Objective] To compare the eardio pulmonary resuscitation effect between THUMPER CPR System （an automatic mechanical CPR device） and traditional human/manual CPR （HCPR） so as to evaluate the application value of the THUMPER CPR System （TCPR） instruments in emergency treatment. [Methods] 248 TCPR cases and 223 HCPR cases were reviewed and analyzed respectively. By excluding the impact of the factors such as pathogenies and starting time of CPR, we made the eomparasion of success rate and survival rate between the two ways. [Results] The success rate and survival rate of using TCPR were higher than that of using HCPR （P〈0.05）. The former was 34% and 14%, while the latter was 21% and 5% （P〈0.05）; The incidences complication with the two methods were almost the same. （P〈0.05）. [Conclusions] TCPR is an ideal new type instrument which can replace the HCPR in the future. It is worthy of being promoted and applied in clinical practice.

关 键 词：心肺复苏 1007型萨勃机 复苏成功率 

分 类 号：R459.7[医药卫生—急诊医学]