检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:奚玮[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学,北京100875
出 处:《河北法学》2008年第3期138-142,共5页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:当事人主义与当事人进行主义是两个不同的概念,不能混淆。两大法系在民事诉讼的运作方式上有职权进行主义和当事人进行主义之别,而在审理的内容上都采取辩论主义,由当事人发挥主导权。但当今世界的两大法系都不约而同地对辩论主义进行修正,加强法官与当事人之间的协力与合作,促进法官在事实发现上的能动性,而逐步采行协同主义民事诉讼模式。构建和谐社会,实现和谐司法,要求建立适合于中国国情的协同主义民事诉讼模式。When it comes to running mode of civil procedure, the Anglo-American legal system adopts the adversary system, and the continental legal system takes the ex officio doctrine. But both of them carries out the policy of principle of pleading on the content of cognizance. Happening in coincide, the two main legal systems in the world at present amend their principle of pleading, reinforce the coo^ration between the party and the judge, promote the judges' subjective initiative , and turn to cooperation mode of civil procedure. In order to establish the harmonious society and implement the harmonious judicatory, it's necessary for China to set up our own principle of cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222