检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵亚超[1] 朱长亮[1] 张志培[1] 袁远[1] 钟代星[1] 程庆书[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学唐都医院胸外科,陕西西安710038
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2008年第3期375-377,共3页Journal of Modern Oncology
基 金:陕西省科学技术研究发展计划项目(编号:2004K13-G17)
摘 要:目的:观察紫杉醇(paclitaxel,Taxel)、长春瑞滨(vinorelbine,NVB)、吉西他滨(gemcitabine,GEM)分别联合顺铂(cisplatin,DDP)方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的疗效及毒副反应。方法:93例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为TP组(紫杉醇+顺铂)32例、NP组(长春瑞滨+顺铂)31例、GP组(吉西他滨+顺铂)30例。给药方法:紫杉醇135mg/m2,第1天;长春瑞滨25mg/m2,吉西他滨1000mg/m2,均在第1、8天使用;顺铂80mg/m2,分2天使用。统计各组有效率(CR+PR)、中位生存期(median duration of survival)、1年生存率(1 year survival rate)。结果:TP组有效率(CR+PR)为43.8%,中位生存期为8.6月,1年生存率为32.1%;NP组有效率为38.7%,中位生存期为8.4月,1年生存率为26.5%;GP组有效率为36.7%,中位生存期为9.4月,1年生存率为38.1%,三组间疗效无显著差异(P>0.05)。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、消化道反应,均可耐受。TP组骨髓抑制发生率相对较高,NP组静脉炎发生率高于TP、GP组,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:三种联合化疗方案对晚期NSCLC疗效确切,三种方案间无显著差异,均可作为一线化疗方案在临床应用。Objective: To observe the effect and toxicity of TP, NP and GP regimen in the chemotherapy of patients with advanced non -small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Total of 93 cases of advanced NSCLC patients were divided into TP group(31 cases) ,NP group(31 cases) and GP group(31cases) randomly. The patients were treated respectively with paclitaxel 135mg/m^2, dl ; vinorelbine 25mg/m^2, d1, 8 ; gemcitabine 1000mg/m^2, d1, 8 ; cisplatin 80mg/m^2 ,d1,2. The reponse rate, median duration of survival and 1 year survival rate were calculated finally. Resuits: The reponse rate was 43.8% in TP group,38.7% in NP group,36.7% in GP group;The median duration of survival were 8.5,8.3 and 9.4 months respectively;the 1 year survival rate were 29.4% ,23.6% , and 38.1% respectively. The efficacy in three groups had no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The major toxicities were bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. The rate of bone marrow suppression of TP group was higher than the other groups, and the NP group had a higher rate of phlebitis than TP and NP. Conclusion : TP, NP and GP regimens are definitely effective in NSCLC patients. There is no significant difference among the three groups. They all can be used as the first line therapy protocols for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44