检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王蕾[1] 孙志华[1] 易铁男[1] 张晓灵[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属襄樊医院肿瘤科,湖北襄樊441021
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2008年第3期415-416,共2页Journal of Modern Oncology
摘 要:目的:探讨生物化疗在肾癌根治术后的治疗作用。方法:对69例行肾癌根治术后的患者按治疗方法分为A、B两组,A组术后用α-干扰素和5-氟尿嘧啶,B组用白细胞介素-2、α-干扰素和5-氟尿嘧啶联合治疗。比较两组术后生存率。结果:通过随访比较,两组早期(I-II期)肾癌根治术后患者1年-3年生存率差异无显著性(P>0.05),晚期(III期)肾癌根治术后患者3年生存率差异有显著性(P<0.05)。所有患者没有发生严重毒副反应。结论:白细胞介素-2、α-干扰素联合5-氟尿嘧啶对晚期肾癌有效,疗效优于仅用α-干扰素和5-氟尿嘧啶。Objective:To evaluate the effect of biochemotherapy on the treatment of renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Methods: A total of 69 patients with renal cell carcinoma were divided into two groups by therapeutic methods. Only interferon - a and 5 - fluorouracil were used in group A; in group B, interleukin - 2 combined with interferon - a and 5 - fluorouracil were used after operation. The survival rate was compared between the two groups. Results: The difference of 1 - , 2 - and 3 - year survival rate of the patients in early - stage ( stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ) renal cell carcinoma between the two groups had no significance (P 〉 0. 05 ). There was a significant difference in 3 - year survival rate between the two groups in advanced ( stage Ⅲ) renal cell carcinoma (P 〈 0. 05 ). There was no severe toxicity. Conclusion: Interleukin - 2, interferon - α and 5 - fluorouracil combination therapy was effective for advanced renal cell carcinoma, which was better than interferon - α and 5 - fluorouracil.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42