泪道高频电灼浚通术后两种药物充注效果的临床观察  

The efectiveness of two drugs for the treatment of tear path block

作　　者：王育文[1] 张大矛[1] 袁建树[1] 金亚明[1] 龚雁[1] 王夏军[1] 杨梁燕[1] 王鹏赟[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省宁波市第六医院眼科,315040

出　　处：《临床眼科杂志》2008年第1期57-58,共2页Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology

摘　　要：目的探讨泪道高频电灼浚通术后两种不同药物充注的效果。方法237例(258只眼)泪道阻塞随机分成两组,A组120例(120只眼)和B组117例(128只眼)。分别应用典必舒眼膏充注和透明质酸钠充注。术后观察1周、1个月、3个月、6个月、1年。结果术后典必舒眼膏充注组治愈109只眼,有效12只眼,共121只眼(93.79%),无效8只眼(6.21%)。透明质酸钠充注组治愈49只眼,有效48只眼,共97只眼(75.78%),无效31只眼(24.22%)。两组间差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。结论典必舒眼膏充注组疗效明显优于透明质酸钠充注组。Objective To study the efectiveness of two drugs for the treatment of tear path block. Methods 237 case（258 eyes） was divided into two groups that were injected two different drugs after the treatment of tear path block. The recurrence were observed. Results The total recurrence rate was 93.79% （ 121eyes） in A group after 6 month and 75.78% （ 97eyes ） in B group. Conclusion In the treatment of tear path block, A group better B group.

关 键 词：泪道浚通 药物充注 高频电灼浚通术 典必舒眼膏 透明质酸钠 

分 类 号：R779.6[医药卫生—眼科]