检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱芳[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学外语学院
出 处:《世界文学评论(长江文艺出版社)》2007年第2期88-91,共4页The World Literature Criticism
摘 要:华兹华斯是英国著名诗人,其诗学博大精深,存在与中国诗学理论相比较的因素。在诗的内容上,华兹华斯的"最低微的鲜花"说可与庄子的"天地有大美而不言"说相比较。在诗的情感上,华兹华斯的童年理念可与李贽的"童心说"相比较。在诗的语言上,华兹华斯"采用人们真正使用的语言"的主张可与钟嵘、刘毓崧的理论相比较。以文学批评史的方式对这些学说进行深入的比较研究,或可加深我们对华兹华斯诗学的认识。Wordsworth is a famous English poet, who has set up a broad and profound theory in poetics. There are many coincidences between Wordsworth' s poetic ideas and the Chinese poetic theory. Three pairs of the basic problems are discussed in a comparative way. They are “the meanest flower” by Wordsworth vs.“the most beautiful world” by Zhuang Zi ; the theory of childhood by Wordsworth vs. that of childlike innocence by Li Zhi and “the real language people use”. by Wordsworth vs. the theory of Zhong Rong and Liu Yusong. A profound comparative study on these theories may help us understand Wordsworth' s poetics better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7