检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭明[1] 薛华[1] 化罗明[1] 郝淑香[1] 韩颖[1] 王四宝[1]
出 处:《肿瘤》2008年第2期150-152,共3页Tumor
基 金:河北省科技攻关计划资助项目(编号:072761435)
摘 要:目的:探索更有效的急性早幼粒细胞白血病(acute promyelocyte leukemia,APL)缓解后的治疗方案。方法:初治APL患者应用全反式维甲酸(all-trans retinoic acid,ATRA)诱导分化,达到完全缓解(complete response,CR)的50例患者分为2组,采取不同的缓解后治疗方案:复方黄黛片和化疗交替组(A组,23例);ATRA和化疗交替组(B组,27例),比较2种缓解后治疗方案的远期疗效。结果:50例患者中复发8例,A组1/23例(4.3%),B组7/27例(25.9%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.038)。远期疗效A组明显优于B组(3年无病生存率分别为100%和79%,5年无病生存率分别为91%和58%,P=0.023)。结论:复方黄黛片与化疗交替为一种理想的APL缓解后治疗方案,疗效优于ATRA与化疗交替组。Objective:To explore a more effective treatment regimen for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) after complete remission (CR). Methods:Fifty patients with newly diagnosed APL were induced to CR by all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). They were divided into two groups. Twenty-three patients in group A were given with alternative therapy with compound realgar and natural indigo tablet (CRNIT) and combined chemotherapy. Twenty-seven patients in group B were treated with alternative therapy with ATRA and combined chemotherapy. Long-term clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Eight of the total 50 patients relapsed. The relapse rates in group A and group B were 4.3% and 25.9%, respectively. The difference was significant (P=0.038). The three-year and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of group A was markedly superior than group B (100% and 91% vs 79% and 58%; P=0.023). Conclusion: Alternative therapy with CRNIT and combined chemotherapy for APL patients after CR was more effective than that of ATRA and combined chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249