继承与批判——邓恩模仿怀亚特对“男怨诗”的解构  

Imitation and Criticism Donne’s Deconstruction of"Poetry of Male Complaint"by Imitating Thomas Wyatt

作　　者：李正栓[1] 刘露溪[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学外国语学院,河北石家庄050016

出　　处：《外语教学》2008年第2期61-65,71,共6页Foreign Language Education

基　　金：河北省哲学社会科学规划研究2006年度项目<邓恩〈歌与短歌集〉的思想与艺术>(课题号:200605012)的阶段成果之一

摘　　要：在男权主导下的17世纪英国社会里,多数男子背信弃义、负心薄情,蔚然成风。作为诗人,怀亚特和邓恩敏锐地感受到这个久已存在并且仍然盛行的社会问题。他们借用当时时髦的彼特拉克传统的"男怨诗"作伪装,通过交换性别视角,用心良苦而又机智巧妙地指责和批判了把朝三暮四、负心薄情理所当然地看作是男子本性而被视而不见的世俗怪象,是对彼特拉克传统的"男怨诗"的完全解构。他们通过怒不可遏的斥责与咒骂来唤起人们对这一社会问题的关注,从而唤醒男子对朝秦暮楚的劣根性进行自责的良知,以促进两性关系的和谐发展,实现平等真爱。During the Medieval Age and Renaissance period, Petrarchan poetry of “male complaint” reflected the custom of “ladies first” observed by knights at that particular time. Many English poets imitated Petrarch and created numerous poems of “male complaint”. However, it is safe to claim that this kind of poetry is less perplexed torture from “cold lady” than their self-indulgence in self-contradicted psychology of laying down double requirements on women. At the same time, male authority predominated in English society where man＇s fickleness was still fashionable and taken for granted. Therefore, Wyatt and Donne, in disguise of Petrarch＇s poetry of “male complaint”, through exchanging point of view of the two sexes in pointing out and criticizing severely the unfaithful nature of men in general, deconstructed the Petrarchan traditon of “male complaint”. By doing so, they both called on people to care for this social problem in order to wake up men to self-reproach of their inconstancy, which can be contributive to realizing a harmonious and equally true love between the two sexes.

关 键 词：彼特拉克“男怨诗” 批判 解构 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学] I207.42