论程序正义视域中死刑案件二审开庭问题  

The Problems about the Trial-Opening of Death-Penalty Cases of the Second Trial Procedure in the Light of Procedure Justice

作　　者：胡常龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法学论坛》2008年第2期51-58,共8页Legal Forum

摘　　要：死刑核准权归位后死刑案件程序的正当化、规范化问题成为司法实践的迫切需要,其中死刑案件二审程序的正当化问题由于二审程序在整个死刑案件程序中的独特功能和作用就显得尤为突出。深入研究和挖掘程序功能,保证死刑案件被告人辩护权等程序参与权,有效贯彻全面审查与重点审查相结合、事实审与法律审相结合、关键证人出庭作证与书面审证相结合等诉讼原则,规范完善死刑案件二审程序,成为确保死刑案件裁判结论实体公正和程序公正相统一、法律效果和社会效果相统一、惩罚犯罪与保障人权相统一的根本保障和基本要求。After the retrieval of competence for examination and approval of death sentences, it will be urgent in the judicial practice to legalize and normalize the procedure of death penalty case. And because of the unique function in entire death penalty ease procedure, the legalisation problem of second trial procedure of death penalty case will become outstanding. So we should make a try to study and excavate the procedure function in depth, ensure the participatory rights of procedure, for example the right to defense, and carry out proceeding principles effectively,such as the combination of the comprehensive review and the key examination, the combination of the reviewing files and arraignment, and the combination of the essential witness appearing in court to testify and adjudication in writing, and so on. These measures will be the fundamental safeguard and essential require, which will ensure the unification of the entity fair and the procedure fair, the unification of the legal effect and the social effect, and the unification of the penalty of crime and the safeguard of human rights.

关 键 词：程序正义 死刑案件 二审开庭 功能 

分 类 号：D915.182[政治法律—诉讼法学]