加重事由之合目的性研究——以我国刑法抢劫罪为研究视角  

Reasons for Heavy Penalty——The Specific Provision of Criminal Law of 263

作　　者：张光宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建警察学院法律系,福建福州350007

出　　处：《三明学院学报》2008年第1期68-73,共6页Journal of Sanming University

摘　　要：我国1997年新修订刑法在分则部分大量使用加重事由,使配刑制度的适用变得更加灵活,但同时也大量增加了加重刑的比例,这势必对现行刑罚体系构成失衡的威胁。这样做是否符合刑罚目的、设定的结构是否合理、对现行的犯罪理论有无冲突之处、对累犯的配刑是否已经超出从重的范围而达到加重的地步,等等,所有这些问题都需要刑法理论给予必要的关注。另外,刑法关于抢劫罪的加重事由虽然只有八项内容,但它代表着许多加重刑的典型特征,完全具备了刑法理论分析和研究加重事由的基本条件,被选为研究的视角也在情理之中。The Specific provision of Criminal Law of 1997 adopts more enhancing penalty evidences, which offers more flexible prerequisites for Penalty system. On the other hand, great existence of enhancing evidences, i.e. the increase of enhancing penalty punishment will doom to threat the balance of punishment system. Whether it is keeping with the penalty purpose or not, whether the structure established is reasonable or not, whether it accords with the criminal theory or not, whether the penalty for the offender with old records has gone beyond the bound of heavy penalty to the enhancing penalty-all the questions mentioned above need to be paid more attention in terms of criminal law theory. Besides, though Criminal Law has only eight items for crime of pillage, it represents the typical features of enhancing penalty, which provides the basic conditions for analyzing and studying enhancing penalty evidence in the perspective of the criminal law theory and naturally becomes the study focus.

关 键 词：加重事由 舍目的性 正当性 

分 类 号：D924.130.4[政治法律—刑法学]