检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2008年第2期36-40,49,共6页美中法律评论(英文版)
基 金:本文受兰州理工大学校基金项目(项目编号:X12200608)资助.
摘 要:In China, the rules of evidence almost is blank space, which makes many scholars try to provide some usage rules for evidences' collection, investigation, judgment, by studying the attribute of evidence. All above make the study about attribute of evidence fall into an error area. The attribute of evidence is not the same as the evidence's characteristic, it is the most foundational nature, which is distinguished from other things. The attribute of evidence and the rules of evidence in litigation belong to different categories, and they can't be made in one unity. This paper aims to put forward the "layer theory" on attribute of evidence through analyzing main error areas of theories in attribute of evidence.由于中国证据规则的基本空白,使得学者们试图通过证据属性问题的研究,为证据的收集、审查、判断等提供证据的使用规则,因而对证据属性问题的研究陷入了误区。证据的属性是证据本身所固有的区别于其它事物的最基本性质,不同于证据的特徵;证据属性与诉讼证据规则属于不同的范畴,不能混为一体。本文针对主流的证据属性理论误区进行分析,并在此基础上提出证据属性的分层次理论。
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28