民事诉权学说探析  

On the Theories about Right of Action

作　　者：戴锐[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《南华大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第1期54-59,共6页Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：诉权,从词义上理解似乎是公民进行诉讼的权利。诉权理论自提出以来,学术界的争论就没有断过,各种学说层出不穷。关于诉权性质以及内容的争论尤其激烈。诉权理论与民事诉讼其他理论范畴有着密切的关联,诉权理论的混乱影响到民事诉讼整个理论体系的和谐。有必要对各种诉权学说的内涵及其反对观点进行比较完整的概括和介绍,在此基础上通过引入诉讼要件的理论,对两种主要的诉权学说进行评析,分析其不足之处,从而得出关于诉权内涵的合理见解。Right of action is the tight for a citizen to start the proceeding. Since the emergence of the theories about right of action, the dispute on them is very furious, especially on what is the property of the right. The theory about right of action has close relationship with the other doctrine in the civil proceeding, and the confusion in this area will definitely lead to the collapse of the whole doctrine system. The content of various theories about right of action and also the refution should be introduced, and through the analysis about the conditions of action of right, the reasonable answer of what the right of action is will be achieved.

关 键 词：诉权 诉权学说 诉讼要件 诉讼审理 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]