检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱风尚[1] 陈锡美[1] 王志荣[1] 张东伟[1] 张霞[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属同济医院消化内科,上海市200065
出 处:《世界华人消化杂志》2008年第5期530-534,共5页World Chinese Journal of Digestology
摘 要:目的:探讨埃索美拉唑对胃食管反流病(GERD)患者症状和生活质量的影响.方法:采用前瞻、随机、阳性对照研究,将经内镜或24 h食管pH监测明确诊断的78例GERD患者随机分为标准剂量的埃索美拉唑(20 mg,2次/d,po)组和加倍剂量的奥美拉唑(20 mg,2次/d,po)组,每组39例.2组分别治疗8 wk,比较2组症状控制、RE内镜下有效率和愈合率、生活质量等区别.结果:共76例患者完成试验.埃索美拉唑组和奥美拉唑组各有1例RE因违反试验方案退出.4 wk和8 wk两组症状总积分治疗后均明显下降,但两组间差异无统计学意义.埃索美拉唑组和奥关拉唑组使NERD症状积分下降程度不如RE患者,但埃索美拉唑组使NERD患者症状积分下降优于奥美拉唑组(P<0.01);两组在烧心和胸痛缓解率上差异明显(78.3%vs 45.5%,64.3%vs 37.5%,均P<0.05),在反酸、咽下困难上无明显差异:4 wk和8 wk对RE内镜有效率和愈合率差异明显(4 wk:88.8%vs 59.3%,80.0%vs 51.9%;8 wk:96.0%vs 70.4%,88.0%vs 63.1%,均P<0.05),埃索美拉唑组患者活力和社会功能疗效明显(92.5±5.7 vs 85.3±7.1,85.2±4.6 vs 76.8±6.5,均P<0.05).结论:标准剂量的埃索美拉唑较加倍剂量的奥美拉唑更有效的控制GERD患者(尤其是RE患者)的临床症状,改善活力和社会功能相关的生活质量.AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole with omeprazole on symptom relief and improvement of quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled study was designed. A total of 78 GERD patients diagnosed with endoscope and/or their 24 h esophageal pH monitored were randomized into esomeprazole treatment group and omeprazole treatment group (39 patients each group). Patients in the two groups received standard doses of esomeprazole (20 mg, twice a day, po) or double doses of omeprazole (20 mg, twice a day, po) for cure rate and 8 wk. Sympto0a relief, efficiency, quality of life were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Seven-six patients completed the 8-week therapy. One patient in each group was dropped out because of running counter to the RE testing procedure. Symptoms of the two groups at weeks 4 and 8 were significantly improved. Symptoms of patients in the esomeprazole group were much better improved than those in the omeprazole group (P 〈 0.01). There was a significant difference in remission of heartburn and chest pain between the two groups (78.3% vs 45.5%, 64.3% vs 37.5%, P 〈 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in remission of acid regurgitation and dysphagia between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the efficiency and cure rate at weeks 4 and 8 between the two groups (4 wk: 88.8% vs 59.3%, 80.0% vs 51.9%, P 〈 0.05; 8 wk: 96.0% vs 70.4%, 88.0% vs 63.1%, P 〈 0.05). The quality of life, cure rate, vitality (VT) and social function (SF) were much better improved in the esomeprazole group than in the omeprazole group (92.5 ±5.7 vs 85.3 ± 7.1, 85.2 ± 4.6 vs 76.8 ± 6.5, P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSION: Standard doses of esomeprazole have better effects on improving heartburn and chest pain, cure rate, VT and SF in GERD patients than double doses of omeprazole.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.66