检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭琛[1] 郭其森[1] 齐洁琳[1] 刘群[1] 吴宁[1]
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床》2008年第6期310-312,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
摘 要:目的:评价国产伊班膦酸钠(艾本)治疗非小细胞肺癌骨转移的临床疗效并探讨安全性。同时与骨膦进行疗效和不良反应的比较,寻找更优的治疗方法。方法:将山东省肿瘤医院2003年11月至2006年11月间86例非小细胞肺癌骨转移患者随机分为两组:艾本组44例和骨膦组42例。艾本应用4mg加入500ml生理盐水中静脉滴注2h,每4周应用1次。骨膦应用300mg加入500ml生理盐水中静脉滴注3h,连用5天后改为口服800mg,2次/日,30天为1个周期。化疗方案均选择以顺铂为基础的两药联合方案。治疗2个疗程结束后观察3个月并评价疗效。结果:两组在止痛、活动能力改善和对骨转移灶的有效率方面进行比较,艾本组有效率分别为81.8%(36/44)、68.2%(30/44)和52.3%(23/44),骨膦组分别为73.8%(31/42)、76.2%(32/42)和45.2%(19/42),两组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者用药后一般情况有所改善。不良反应主要表现为一过性发热、消化道反应、骨髓抑制、乏力、四肢肌肉酸痛等,无治疗相关性死亡。结论:艾本治疗非小细胞肺癌骨转移与骨膦疗效和不良反应相当,应用艾本更为方便快捷。Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of lbaudronate and Bonefos for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) witb bone metastases. Methods: A total of 86 NSCLC patients with bone metastases were randomly divided into two groups: 44 in the lbandronate group and 42 in the Bonefos group. The chemotherapy in buth groups was Cisplatin-based. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated after 2 cycles of treatment, with 21 days for each cycle. Results: The response rate of pain relief, improvement in daily living and effective rate on bone metastatic loci was 81.8% (36/44). 68.2%(30/44) and 52.3%(23/44), respectively, in the lbandronate group and 73.8%(31/42), 76.2%(32/42) and 45.2% (19/ 42), respectively, in the Bonefos group. No significant difference was found between the two groups (P〉0.05). The side effects could be tolerated. Conclusion: The effects of Ibandronate and Bonefos on NSCLC patients with bone metastases comparable. The administration of Ibandronate is more convenient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33