异质性的得而复失——柏拉图《巴曼尼德斯篇》读解  

An Encounter with Heterogeneity:An Understanding of Plato’s Parmenides

作　　者：徐长福[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所暨哲学系,广州510275

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2008年第2期59-68,共10页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"马克思实践思想与西方实践哲学传统的关系"(项目批准号:05BZX004);教育部世纪人才支持计划(编号:NCEF-06-0738)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在《巴曼尼德斯篇》中,柏拉图发现,像苏格拉底这样一个具体事物可以同时既类似又不类似,既是一又是多,既是静的又是动的。也就是说,具体事物可以同时分有多个相,包括相反之相。一个具体事物同时拥有多个普遍性质,并且其中许多性质间彼此无关甚至相反,这就是典型的异质性现象。异质性意味着没有任何一个单一的范型或一套同质的范型系统足以提供对于一个具体事物的完备规定,而要完备规定具体事物,范型或范型系统就一定是复数,它们之间不可能最终化约为一。但柏拉图选择了另一条解决之道:放弃相之为同类事物范型的绝对性,转而通过相与相之间的指谓关系将诸相联结成"相的集体",借以说明何以一个具体事物可以分有多个相。这样一来,相与相之间的异质性就被这套同质性的思维程序给消解掉了。In Parmenides, Plato finds that an individual like Socrates can be both like and unlike, both one and many, and both at rest and in motion, i.e., that all things can partake of many forms, including the contraries. It is a typical heterogeneous phenomenon that one individual possesses many universal qualities, among which some are irrelevant and even contrary to one another. Heterogeneity implies that no single paradigm or single homogeneous system of forms can suffice for the complete determinations of one individual, whereas it needs plural paradigms or plural systems of forms which cannot be reduced to singular to determine an individual completely. Plato, however, chooses another way to resolve the problem： to abandon the absoluteness of form as a pattern of the congeners while to combine forms into ＂a collection of forms＂ by virtue of the predication of forms, so as to explain how an individual can partake of many forms. Due to this homogeneous thinking procedure, the heterogeneity among forms is put aside wrongly.

关 键 词：柏拉图 《巴曼尼德斯篇》 相 异质性 同质性 

分 类 号：B502[哲学宗教—外国哲学]