帛书《周易》以史解经刍议  

On the silk manuscript of the Zhouyi's interpretation on I Ching by history

作　　者：郭彧[1] 

机构地区：[1]华北油田油建二公司

出　　处：《周易研究》2007年第5期53-58,共6页Studies of Zhouyi

摘　　要：1973年长沙马王堆出土的帛书《周易》中的《缪和》篇中,有六则以历史故事解说《易经》卦爻辞的例子。本文分析这六则历史故事用以解经的符合程度,以证明用历史故事解经并不始于南宋的杨万里等人,而四库馆臣所谓"一变而胡瑗、程子,始阐明儒理;再变而李光、杨万里,又参证史事,《易》遂日启其论端",并非历史事实。In the chapter of Miu he conceived in the silk manuscript of the Zhouyi excavated at Mawangdui, Changsha in 1973, there are six examples of interpreting the statements of hexagrams and lines in I Ching by historical events. This paper analyzes the coincidence of the statements and the historical events introduced in the examples, and attempts to prove that YANG Wan-li, LI Guang and so on at the Southern Song Dynasty are not the founders who initiated the method of interpreting I Ching by history. It is not true in history as the official editors of Si Ku （ordered by Emperor Qianlong） said： ＂（the meaning pattern Yi-ology founded by WANG Bi） was transformed first by HU Yuan and CHENG Yi, who elaborated Yi-ology by neo-Confucian philosophy; and then was transformed by LI Guang and YANG Wan-li, who corroborate Yi-ology by historical events, which both marked the beginning of the interpreting way of Yi. ＂

关 键 词：缪和 以史解经 四库全书总目 

分 类 号：B221[哲学宗教—中国哲学]