检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市南海区第二人民医院肛肠科,广东南海528200
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2008年第2期35-37,共3页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为比较负压胶圈套扎术和硬化剂注射术治疗Ⅰ,Ⅱ度内痔的近期临床疗效,将180例Ⅰ,Ⅱ度内痔患者行负压胶圈套扎术(治疗组90例)或硬化剂注射术(对照组90例)进行治疗,并对比的近期临床疗效,随访2个月。结果显示,治疗组在术后肛门疼痛、出血、肿物脱出等方面明显低于对照组,满意度明显高于对照组,且无需进一步的治疗。结果表明,负压胶圈套扎术治疗Ⅰ,Ⅱ度内痔简单、方便、并发症少,近期疗效优于硬化剂注射术。For the objective of comparing clinical curative effects of ligation with negative pressure rubber band and injection of sclerosing agent for I or Ⅱ Grade internal hemorrhoids,the 180 cases of this disease were divided into the treatment group( subjected to the ligation,90 cases) and controlled group(subjected to the injection, 90 cases), and compared short-term curative effects. Follow-up of two monthes showed that degree of the treatment group were lower significantly than the controlled group in anus pain, bleeding, and prolapse of lump, etc, and in satisfactory extends distinctly higher than the controlled group, but no needing future treatment. These show that the ligation has easy & simple manipultation and less complication,and is superior to the injection in short-term curative effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3