民事诉权学说探析  

On the Theories about the Right of Action

作　　者：戴锐[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2008年第2期137-143,共7页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：在民事诉权诸学说中,权利保护请求权说和纠纷解决请求权说由于强调各自的诉权要件,因此克服了抽象诉权说过于笼统、内容空洞的缺陷。但是其必然会导致对诉权本身的审查成为诉讼程序的内容,诉权成为程序内的诉权的结果,从而丧失了解释缘何可以开启诉讼的问题的能力。实际上诉讼要件并不是诉权构成要件,诉权应当是启动诉讼程序的权利。Among the theories about the right of action, the claim for rights protection theory and the claim for dispute resolving theory, emphasizing their respective constitutive elements of the right of action, may supply the gap of the theory of abstract right of action. However, these two theories may also lead to the result that the investigation of the right of action itself becomes the substantial part of the proceedings, and the right of action turns into a right in the procedure which thereby fails in answering the question why an action could start up. In fact, the constitutive elements of proceedings are not the requisites of the right of action, and the right of action is a kind of right to initiate the proceedings.

关 键 词：诉权 诉权学说 诉讼要件 诉讼审理 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]