康德的存在论问题与海德格尔的存在论转向  

Kant's Ontology and Heidegger's Ontological Turn

作　　者：李宝文[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学文化哲学研究中心,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《学术交流》2008年第3期17-21,共5页Academic Exchange

摘　　要："Sein(存在)"问题,是整个西方哲学的根本问题。海德格尔通过《存在与时间》重新揭示了存在的意义,彻底扭转了西方哲学传统中的存在论思想。然而,这一革命性转向却是从康德开始的。康德在《纯粹理性批判》一书中,从理性的认识能力出发,运用先天综合判断,已经着手松动了"Sein"的实存特性,判定"Sein"只是一个逻辑系词,本身没有实际意义,使"Sein"从"有"变成了"无",从认识论迈向了存在论。尽管康德的这一步尚不彻底,但是,海德格尔却从中发现了康德存在论的微言妙义,最终实现了从认识论哲学到存在论哲学的彻底转向。The problem of ＂Sein＂ is an essential issue in the whole western world of philosophy. Heidegger revealed the meaning of being through his Time and Being and reversed ontological thoughts in western philosophy. However, this revolutionary shift can trace back to Kant＇ s Critique of Pure Reason. In the book, he started from rational recognition, discussed the characteristics of ＂Sein＂ in the congenital comprehensive judgment, and got a conclusion ＂Sein＂ merely a logical copulative, no practical meaning, which marked a progress from epistemology to ontology. Although it need to complete, Heidegger still found subtle essence of Kant＇ s ontology and finally realized the total shift from epistemology to ontology.

关 键 词：康德 海德格尔 存在 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B516.54