检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶建青[1] 李伟生[1] 梁亚志[1] 刘佳斌[1] 冯昌生[1]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院心理康复中心,南宁530021
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2008年第2期94-96,共3页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
摘 要:目的:采用Meta分析方法比较利培酮与舒必利治疗精神分裂症阴性症状的临床疗效。方法:将利培酮与舒必利治疗精神分裂症阴性症状的16个中文的随机对照研究进行再分析。结果:16个研究的合并效应量(WMD)为-0.58(-1.37,0.21;P>0.05)。阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)阴性因子(N)亚组的WMD为-0.84(-1.91,0.24;P>0.05);阴性症状评定量表(SANS)亚组的WMD为0.19,(-0.77,1.15;P>0.05)。结论:利培酮与舒必利对精神分裂症阴性症状的疗效无显著差别。Objective:To compare the efficacy of risperidone and sulpiride in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia by meta-analysis. Method:Sixteen randomized control study of risperidone and sulpiride published in Chinese were taken into meta-analysis. Results:Total effect size(weighted mean difference,WMD) of sixteen study was - 0.58,95% confidence interval (95% CI) was( - 1.37,0.21 ; P 〉 0.05) ;WMD of negative subgroup of positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS-N) was - 0.84,95% CI was( - 1.91,0.24; P 〉 0.05) ;WMD of score of the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS) sub-group was 0.19,95% CI was (-0.77,1.15,P〉0.05). Conclusion:There are no significant difference between risperidone and sulpiride on efficacy of negative symptoms in the treatment of schizophrenia.
关 键 词:精神分裂症 阴性症状 利培酮 舒必利 META分析
分 类 号:R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145