中国西南地区职业紧张常模及分级标准  

Study of the Occupational Stress Norm and its Application in Southwest China

作　　者：杨新伟[1] 刘泽军[1] 庞星火[1] 李微[1] 赵培青[1] 白韶音[1] 王治明[2] 金泰廙[3] 

机构地区：[1]北京市疾病预防控制中心,北京100020 [2]四川大学华西公共卫生学院,成都610041 [3]复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海200032

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2007年第4期233-236,共4页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：4国家自然科学基金资助项目(30500402)

摘　　要：目的:制订职业紧张量表总体、性别常模、粗分转换为T分表及分级标准。方法:采用职业紧张量表(OSI-R),对4278例常模样本施测。结果:职业、性别、学历是影响OSI-R问卷结果最多的变量(Beta=-0.39、-0.13、-0.25)。职业任务、紧张反应总均分及各子项得分(除工作环境、业务、心理紧张反应外)男性均高于女性(P<0.01)。娱乐休闲子项评分男性高于女性(27.6±5.5/27.1±5.4,P<0.01),自我保健子项评分女性高于男性(30.2±5.6/29.0±5.8,P<0.01)。采用OSI-R量表分别研制了中国西南地区职业紧张量表总体、不同性别常模、粗分转换为T分表。职业紧张程度分级标准:职业任务和紧张反应问卷中,T分≥70分者,为高度职业紧张、紧张反应;T分在60～69分为中度职业紧张、紧张反应;T分在40～59分,为适度职业紧张和紧张反应,处于正常范围;T分40分为相对缺乏职业紧张和紧张反应。在应对资源问卷中,T分<30分为高度缺乏应对资源;T分在30～39分为中度缺乏应对资源;T分在40～59分为有适度的应对资源,属于正常范围;T分≥60分为有很强的应对资源。结论:不同职业、性别、受教育程度、年龄、个体、职业紧张程度不同。Objective： To establish the norm of occupational stress norm, as well as gender normative sample in southwest China. Methods： In this study, cross - sectional study method, and a synthetic way of sorting and randomized sampling were adopted to deal with research targets with revised occupational stress inventory （OSI -R） for 4278 participants. Results： The results of gender show that there were heavier occupational role , stronger interpersonal and physical strain in male than that in female （166. 5 ± 27. 0/158.5 ± 26. 4, 25.6 ± 4.4/25. 1 ± 4. 4, 22. 6 ± 5.6/21.2 ±5.2, P 〈0. 01 ） . The score of recreation in the male is higher than that in female （27. 6 ±5. 5/27. 1 ±5.4）, but the score of self-care in the female is higher than that in male （30. 2 ±5.6/29.0 ±5.8, P 〈0. 01 ） . Occupational stress norm, scale raw score to T - score conversion tables for the total, gender normative samples were modulated. classification criterion： For the ORQ and PSQ scales, scores at or above 70T indicated a strong levels of maladaptive stress and strain. Score in the range of 60T to 69T suggested middle levels of maladaptive stress and strain. Score in the range of 40T to 59T indicated normal levels of stress and strain. Score below 40T indicated a relative absence of occupational stress and strain. For the PRQ scales, score below 30 T indicate a significant lack of coping resources. Score in the range of 30 T to 39 T suggested middle deficits in coping resources. Score in the range of 40T to 59T indicated average coping resources. Scores at or above 60T indicate a strong levels of coping resources. Conclusions： Different population has different occupational stress.

关 键 词：职业卫生 职业紧张 横断面调查 OSI-R 常模 

分 类 号：G449.7[哲学宗教—心理学]